« Home | The Five Dysfunctions of a Team » | 回來了 » | 獻給無名的傳道者 » | The Potential of a Game Player » | Leaders » | 傻眼(二) » | 傻眼 » | 從巴士阿叔到會考手機出貓 » | What Guidance Is... and Is Not » | The Calling of Marriage »


I've clipped out this article from Mingpao for quite a few days already but don't have the time to scan it until now. 馬傑偉 makes a very good point: the magazine covers are clearly 性騷擾, but how come nobody feels offended?
But what I cannot agree with the article is, if those magazine covers are 性騷擾, what makes "classic" pornography ok? Are they not of the same nature of dehumanizing females?


  • 正如林一峰話齋,閱讀,也是一種 state of mind。
  • 所以不限文字,還有聲音影像一切雜崩能東西,都在涉獵反思消化乾坤大挪移之列。
  • 看重的只有一個字:Insight


I work at Westside Baptist Church. Of course, that doesn't mean they agree with everything I post or link here. Everything here is my personal opinion and is not read or approved in advance. Consider yourself warned.