性騷擾
I've clipped out this article from Mingpao for quite a few days already but don't have the time to scan it until now. 馬傑偉 makes a very good point: the magazine covers are clearly 性騷擾, but how come nobody feels offended?
But what I cannot agree with the article is, if those magazine covers are 性騷擾, what makes "classic" pornography ok? Are they not of the same nature of dehumanizing females?
But what I cannot agree with the article is, if those magazine covers are 性騷擾, what makes "classic" pornography ok? Are they not of the same nature of dehumanizing females?
Labels: Reflection
